Universal Access To All Knowledge
Home Donate | Store | Blog | FAQ | Jobs | Volunteer Positions | Contact | Bios | Forums | Projects | Terms, Privacy, & Copyright
Search: Advanced Search
Anonymous User (login or join us)
Upload

Reply to this post | See parent post | Go Back
View Post [edit]

Poster: He Live's Date: Mar 4, 2008 8:35am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: SDH recommended a show from what year?

1. nice job on the bridsong post -- we need more quality efforts like that around here...

2. you must be confusing SDH/Some Dark Hollow with someone else -- as far as i can tell that guy only likes shows from like 82-85

3. thanks for bringing this one up, i have had it on the todo list for a while, but there is so much great 73.... and 77.... and 69, and 72.... and i actually like 71 quite a bit, and 70.....81, 78, 74, 68 and 80 aren't so bad either -- OH, and i heard a GREAT 84 the other day -- NOW that SDH guy, he probably RECKED that one -- i believe that!


HERE's TO VANCOUVER!

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: elbow1126 Date: Mar 4, 2008 9:21am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: SDH recommended a show from what year?

Thanks, enjoy the show.

As for getting a "blow me" from SDH that is kind of like a badge of honor or rite of passage. He actually tried to trademark the phrase at one point but was beaten to the Patent and Trademark Office by Bill Clinton. I suspect Bill has used the line more successfully than SDH anyways...

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: SomeDarkHollow Date: Mar 4, 2008 9:01am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: SDH recommended a show from what year?

One...no, two...words:

Blow Me.

See, same Hollow.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: He Live's Date: Mar 4, 2008 9:10am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: SDH recommended a show from what year?

assuming that you're kidding, like me.

signed,
sensitive boy

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: SomeDarkHollow Date: Mar 4, 2008 9:13am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: SDH recommended a show from what year?

Many apologies if this was interpreted in any way as a negative.

Purely in jest.

Those who have been around for way too long will be more than happy to regale you with tales of my overuse of the phrase, something I have attempted to curtail, but, as seen here, I haven't yet completely succeeded.

Terms of Use (10 Mar 2001)